Taylor Pointing At Travis During Blank Space Should Be Enough Proof About It Being Pr. Like, Are You

Not socialist in a “I won’t have to work” type of way but socialist in a “I’ll still be working but I won’t be worried I won’t make the rent” type of way. In a “billions won’t be hoarded by one person” type of way. In a “janitors, fast-food workers, child care workers, preschool teachers, hotel clerks, personal care and home health aides, and grocery store cashiers, will live comfortably” type of way. In a “the sick and elderly will be cared for” type of way. In a “no child should work” type of way.

This is wild. I love it

Now she gets the mojo dojo casa house, get the kids, get the prize, picture me thick as thieves with you ex long term distance low commitement casual girlfriend

reblog if you're a lover defender

Seeing that I thought, isnt midnights an experimental album that has songs written all throught Taylor life?? The ones that she is confessing all her truth (or the one she wants to share)?? If that is correct, then what she is impliying is that all her music, more specifically, the vault tracks, are her real thruth. To me, it just feels like a call for us to listen to her music and what she writes about (she is first and foremost a storyteller) more than about the narrative that she so loudly sells to the world.

Also, being a little bit more delusional, I think at the end of it, we will get out of the night and step into the daylight, whatever that means. For my personal bias, I think is a coming out of some short or something like that, but I think she is going to reveal some kind of groundbraking truth when this era is over.

Hits diferent (HD) and I dont wanna live forever (IDWLF) might as well just be the same song separated in two.

Both of them have the same themes and imaginary. Both are about a girl deeply heartbroken that tries to party away the pain of the break up and then cries when it doesnt work.

Now, being stated that, we know that the songs on the midnight album are song that Taylor write in different times of her life, and noticing the similarities between HD and IDWLF, it only makes sense to think they were written at the exact same time, about the same situation and muse.

I know that IDWLF is a song for a film, but it can still apply to Taylors life and sitution, since she has stated that she writes from a personal experience. Maybe the song was intended to fit the plot of the movie but she probably took some of her own felings and experiences and putted them into it.

Also, both of them fit the narrative of 1989. She was out and about, partying eith the girlies and all the stuff and she was also heartbroken (like she stated in the vault tracks).

Now, I am about to dive into swifgron, so if you dont like it, I suggest you to stop reading now.

Taylor posted this video:

She made sure we wached the bunny. She even looked at the screen (with 0 discrepcion, may I add) to make sure it was there. You know whos nickname was bunny, you are right, Dianna Agron.

For the propose of this theory, I will take that as a confirmation that IDWLF is about Dianna (if people can make the case for ATW being about Jake because of a scarf or all 1989 about Harry for a few pap pictures, I guess we will have no problem making the case for Dianna and IDWLF based on that video).

Then, if IDWLF is basically the same song as HD (based on the parallels of their lyrics and all the stuff I pointed before) and if IDWLF muse is Dianna Agron then we could that Hits different is about Dianna Agron.

Thats it. Thats all I have to say today.

Disclaimer: this is just my interpretation and by sharing this I am not saying this is the truth or that Taylor said that to me or something like that. I am just reading and analising the art and content she putted out there.

Obviously

"do you seriously think you're above the rules" the stupid ones yeah

Dont you ever just hate a girl so much you develop a crush on her or is it just me?

Currently watching the Swiftologist reaction to the "Look what we made Taylor Swift do" article and I have to stop it and say something:

TAYLOR SWIFT HAS NOT STATED NOTHING IN THE MATTERS OF HER SEXUALITY

In the first few minutes he was already spreading missinformation, saying that Taylor has, in multiple times, said that she is straight. She has never done that. This really would not bother me so much if he did not went on about how gaylors use false information for our "conspiracy theories".

Excuse me, but queerflaging and queercoding is a thing that has been going on for as long as queer people have existed. One might think that being part of our community he would know that, but apparently, he does not. This is what queer people not knowing about the history of their own community does, this is why we need conversations about flagging and queerness to be open. We should be taught about it, it is part of human history after all, an important part of it. If you doubt it, just take a look at almost every important figure on history, they were most likely queer and it affected their life and how they shaped the world. Queerflagging is part of history, not a conspiracy theory.

Talking about conspiracy theories, we could say saying she is straight is as well a conspiracy theory if we are going to say gaylor is one. I mean, she has remained unlabled about her sexuality to the public, so is only fair to assume that she could be attracted to any gender as far as we know.

Gaylors dont claim to know Taylors sexual orientation. Hetlors are the one hyperfixated on her straightness and sexuality. Gaylor reads the work of Taylor Swift through queer lenses with the propouse of relating to her music in a deeper level. Hetlors claim she is straight even if she has not say that before and punish any other idea that diverse from that even if, as far as we know, that idea could be wrong.