Some Face Casts Made From Plaster And Painted With Acrylic Paint Inspired By Hasegawa Tohaku's Mystical

How have contemporary values and media impacted upon the 16th century genre of Still Life?

Still life has changed dramatically throughout the ages but it is still popular today even if we might not realise it. Ranking the lowest in importance in the hierarchy of genres, established by the French Royal Academy, the still life was seen to require less skill than portrait paintings and historical paintings. However despite the perception that still life paintings were easier to paint, they explored dark and morbid themes usually to convey the message ‘memento mori’, ‘remember you will die’ and ‘vanitas’ ,originating from the word ‘vanity’, which would remind the viewer of their mortality and of the worthlessness of worldly pleasures . This was done by using skulls in compositions and candles that had just been blown out with the last wisp of smoke visible, symbolising death blatantly. On the other hand, some messages were more hidden in the paintings. Many pieces reflected death and  human nature in a very subtle way. This can be seen in Jan Davidsz. de Heem: Still-Life with Lobster and Nautilus Cup. The tipping cup could show the fragility and instability of humanity. The lobster is seen at the bottom of the composition and was regarded as something exquisite and expensive, only intended as banquet food. The lobster is inedible and ugly when alive and in the ocean but when dead, it possesses its delicious and beautiful qualities and is seen as something expensive and intended for the upper-classes. Maybe Jan Davidsz intended this to also reflect humanity and death.

The golden age of still life painting took place in the 17th century but throughout the 18th century and 19th century it became slightly less popular. In the Victorian era, still life compositions included every-day house-hold objects. However flower paintings gained a lot of popularity in the 1800’s, painters like Manet, in his painting ‘Bouquet of flowers’ (1882) and Van Gough in his ‘Still Life with Irises’ (1890) made their canvases bloom with their lively and vibrant colours with the intentions to make the paintings aesthetic and pleasant to the eye with harmonious colours. In the 19th century, the still life was adopted by Pablo Picasso and painted in his cubist style which was full of colour in contrast with the very first still life paintings which were full of shadows and chiaroscuro.

Nowadays, still lifes are created in a much different way influenced by new media. Instead of using the traditional oil paint and canvas, photography is used to capture aesthetic and ornamental scenes. These photographs are usually shared on social media instead of being sold or exhibited in a gallery. The purpose is solely to look pleasing to the eye or are created to show the life of the photographer of the arrangement. They often exhibit lavish food and drink that looks impressive or books and items related to the photographer. The still lifes are carefully arranged to look as perfect and possible. Although these photos with a pleasant colour palette do not have hidden messages of death and mortality, they reflect society and its quest for perfection in the modern age where you are what you post.

References :

https://www.britannica.com/art/still-life-painting#:~:text=The%20painting%20generally%20considered%20to,Lowlands%20during%20the%2017th%20century.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/b/british-watercolours-still-life-flower-painting/

https://www.romepix.com/blog/the-dutch-golden-age-in-art-pieter-claesz

https://fashionhedge.com/2017/06/19/net-bag-trend/

https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/v/vanitas

          Ethics and art - How considerate does an artist have to be?

Contemporary art seeks to challenge traditional boundaries, almost seeing how far it can go before it crosses the line. It can at times be confusing, confrontational and controversial and can shock or thrill the audience depending on the subject matter. Contemporary art can be anything from an installation to a painting, a performance to a sculptural piece, it can even be a random object that is claimed to be art. As there is no uniformity or formula, the artist can use any medium and can exhibit anything he/she wishes to.

Controversy in the art world has always existed. Even in Caravaggio’s religious works in the 15th century which depicted religious figures in a very realistic manner. One of his most controversial paintings at the time was ‘The Death Of The Virgin’ which depicted The Virgin Mary on her death bed. The controversy was not of the subject matter but more about the way that this biblical scene was painted. The Virgin Mary can be seen with her hand over her slightly bloated stomach and bared ankles which the audience found very upsetting. For these reasons it was rejected by the Chapel of Santa Maria della Scala for which it was commissioned by in Rome. It was also said that the woman that modelled The Virgin Mary for this painting was a common prostitute working in Rome. This brought further distaste to the artwork. Nowadays, it is a revered masterpiece however when painted, it was disputed over. A controversial modern day representation of The Virgin Mary is ‘The Holy Virgin Mary’ by Chris Ofili’. This painting depicts The Virgin Mary surrounded by the backsides of Women from adult magazines, balancing the canvas on two pieces of elephant dung. Ofili stated that it is a ‘hip-hop version (of the figure)’. The painting stands out with its vibrant use of colour, the yellow and purple starkly contrast with each other making the painting quite jarring and bright. Many would not find the artwork offensive at all however at the same this portrayal offended many religious people. It is difficult to please every individual audience member although I think that there is an unspoken responsibility to have mutual respect for the audience and be considerate of groups of the audience that may see your work.

When it comes to exhibiting artwork, ethics are important to consider. This form of ‘moral accountability’ encourages the respect of the audience. However, everyone will have a different opinion and take on the artwork and our life experiences will cause us to interpret art in various ways. At the end of the day, it is up to the artist to decide what to include in their work but some may argue that this doesn’t mean that the artist shouldn’t be held accountable for any content they exhibit. On the other hand, some artworks are intended to be controversial and aim to shock. The series of work 'Plum Grove' by Peter Howson (1994) does just that. This series of paintings, influenced by the break-up of Yugoslavia and the creation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, aims to portray these events in a graphic manner and the effect of the war on the civilians. Howson was the official War Artist for the British contingent of the UN Peace Keeping Force to Bosnia in 1993. As a result, his paintings included rape scenes, violence, and other graphic scenes which he witnessed himself or from eye-witness accounts. His paintings depict people in contorted positions with green and blue skin tones giving a sense of distress and pain. The paintings are quite expressive and have a sense of movement alongside a sense of exaggeration, exaggerating various features of the figures giving a further sense of suffering. The paintings undoubtedly leave the audience feeling uncomfortable. Although this series of work is in a way raising awareness of the events, some may say that censorship is necessary. Audience members who were not victims of the Yugoslavian conflicts or who have never experienced war of any kind can’t relate to the imagery as much as war survivors or people who have witnessed similar events. Although the subject matter is distressing and upsetting, the audience members are all effected in different ways based on their life experiences. The artist can choose whether or not to censor their work or to take ethics into consideration depending on the emotions they wish to stir up.

Appropriation, borrowing or recycling aspects of someone else’s work, plays a big role in contemporary artwork too. For example, in Banksy’s piece, ‘Show me the Monet’ (2005) a framed image of Monet’s painting is visible with orange shopping trolleys and traffic cones in his famous lily pond. I think that it shows the over-commercialisation of Monet’s work and art in general. Nowadays it is easy to see images of artwork online and it’s also common to buy merchandise with various pieces of art printed on. The imperative ‘Show me’ in the title of the piece further emphasises our consumerist society and ever growing demand for instant gratification. All of this has contributed to the devaluation of the artwork. Although the physical painting still costs a fortune, it is accessible on many platforms and is over-marketed so its purpose and meaning have been lost in the process.

I think that when it comes to handling delicate subject matters, it is important to somewhat take the audience into consideration. Some artwork is made for the audience to question and to be shocked by and will affect everyone in a different way but I think that there can be some occasions where a piece of controversial artwork can become disrespectful. Overall, I think that it is the role of the artist to push the boundaries of modern-day society and to adapt when necessary; a sense of mutual respect for all opinions and all views is important. Despite the fact that nowadays, art is created to challenge the audience and express emotion, I think that it’s the role of every artist to know what is appropriate and what isn’t depending on the subject matter they wish to portray.

 References

https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/howson-plum-grove-t06961

https://artswithanna.com/2018/09/28/ethics-and-arts/

https://www.dazeddigital.com/art-photography/article/39894/1/that-time-this-chris-ofili-the-holy-virgin-mary-hip-hop-pissed-off-the-art-world

Sculpture workshop : Today I cast my sculptures in plaster and after painting them with shellac, I covered them in PVA glue and sprinkled them with copper and oxidized it so that in a few weeks they will go green. This will give an old feel to the sculptures. I am also going to paint some with acrylic paint and some with shoe polish

Embroidery for my ‘Then and Now project’ which is my own design inspired by Slovak folk patterns. It is embroidered onto a blouse which will go with a skirt (that I am currently working on) :)

The process of making my book. After illustrating all of my pictures and typewriting the story, I stitched all the components onto card with some colourful thread and I then stuck these into a book which I bound. The book is called ‘Reconnection’. A short illustrated story I wrote, about a city where the sun has stopped shining, a girl goes on an adventure into the forest to bring the sun back. It is about reconnecting to cultural heritage in the modern world :)

Kehinde Wiley and the male identity.

Kehinde Wiley , ‘Alexander The Great’ - Oil on canvas, 2005 ( 243.8 × 182.9 cm)

Kehinde Wiley is an African-American artist who conveys sensitive messages through his naturalistic, bright and vibrant work. In many of his paintings Wiley presents the male identity in a unique way. His painting ‘Alexander the Great’ showcases this, presenting a young African-American man in modern attire holding a sword and standing in front of a brocade-like pattern; typical of medieval tapestries and byzantine silk production in the 6th century. 

Much of Wiley’s inspiration comes from classical paintings. The name of this painting ‘Alexander the Great’ references one of the greatest warriors in history. In his time, it was rumoured that Alexander the Great was Zeus himself. By the age of 25 Alexander was The king of Macedonia, leader of the Greeks, overlord of Asia Minor, pharaoh of Egypt and 'great king' of Persia. Although he was a great ancient leader, his brutality was also renowned and was known to be self-indulgent and reckless.

Wiley has also drawn inspiration from various paintings of Napoleon. His painting ‘Napoleon leading the army over the alps' is similar to that of Jacques-Louis David’s 19th century painting, ‘Napoleon Crossing the Alps’. Not just the names are similar, but the positions on horseback of both men in the paintings. However the man presented in Wiley’s painting wears an army uniform, giving his modern interpretation of the painting of Napoleon. 

The painting, ‘Alexander the Great’ explores the male identity in a distinctive way that references the past and present. The painting is full of juxtapositions for example with the man’s headphones and the centuries old sword he is holding, the modern designer logo on his coat and the ancient textile pattern behind him. In paintings, a sword symbolises protection, strength and courage, which are all  traditionally ‘typical’ male traits and something that Wiley strives to challenge. These ideals clash with the background colour which is green which represents peace, harmony and balance. These are more favoured male traits nowadays. Furthermore, it is possible to see that the background brocade pattern comes round and over the figure in the painting in some areas coming into the very foreground. The swirling and smooth pattern softens the painting and wraps around the strong and proud pose the man stands in. Brocade fabric and patterns are typically expensive and historically show upper class. The pattern makes Wiley’s painting appear more ornate and regal and also softens the proud pose of the man and shows delicacy and gentleness.

The pose in the painting is reminiscent of the painting ‘Napoleon Bonaparte in his Study at the Tuileries’, 1812, which presents Napoleon in a similar pose, with his hand on his hip, looking straight at the viewer in an imposing way, with a sword also featuring in the painting showing his masculinity and strength. Paintings of Napoleon are often grand and show his great power, but his violent tyranny and invasions are said to have been ‘grounded by an aggressive over-compensation for his short stature’ some historians say. 

I think that this pressure of being as masculine as possible was something felt in the past as much as it is in today’s society which is something that Wiley intends to convey in his paintings. In my opinion, Wiley intends to show changing attitudes toward the male identity by referencing hyper masculine historical paintings. Wiley contrasts these attitudes with flowers, soft colours and intricate patterns, challenging the old ideals of male identity but also giving them a different and new relevance in the modern day.

References:

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alexander-the-Great

https://www.artsy.net/artwork/kehinde-wiley-alexander-the-great

https://www.theartstory.org/artist/wiley-kehinde/

https://cxainc.com/edition/portraits-inspired-by-napoleon-by-kehinde-wiley-and-jacques-louis-david-come-together-for-the-first-time-ever/

Installation art and Roman Ondak

Roman Ondak, ‘Event Horizon’ - installation art, 2016-17

Roman Ondak (1966) is a contemporary Slovak artist who grew up under the communist regime (1948-89), this experience is reflected in much of his work. He explores alternate political possibilities and questions the failure of the communist regime in his pieces. His exhibition, ‘The Source Of Art Is In The Life Of A People’ was exhibited in the South London Gallery in 2016-17. The centrepiece of the exhibition was ‘Event Horizon’ which uses an 100 year old oak tree sourced from  the area around Žilina in Slovakia where Roman Ondak is originally from. The oak tree is split into 100 separate discs and on each of these discs is a certain event in history which Ondak has chosen. The exhibition lasted for 100 days and on each day, the consecutive disc was put up onto the wall until all of them were up on display.

The first disc of the oak tree which was put on the wall represented the year 1917 and Ondak has chosen the Russian revolution to be the main event in that year. The events are printed onto the wood in which its natural qualities like cracks and the grain are still visible. This gives a more organic and textured feel to the installation.

The title of the Installation is particularly interesting, it is called ‘Event Horizon’ which is the boundary around a black hole from which no radiation or matter can escape. It is called the event horizon because it is at that point of a black hole where space and time begin to change and distort. This scientific title may reflect the efforts of the Communist Regime to encourage atheism across its states and promote science and technology. Ondak has used this idea of a liminal zone around a black hole to convey a certain meaning in his work. History is something that we can not change, and in Ondak’s installation he is simply stating facts about the past. The past can not be changed however calling the piece ‘Event Horizon’ ,referring to the state in which history can be altered, may reveal Ondak’s own desire to change it. This juxtaposes and contrasts with the heavy, old and historic oak tree which is not malleable and can not be distorted. Perhaps highlighting some oppression he may have experienced when growing up under the regime. 

The use of the oak tree which is specifically from his region in Slovakia symbolises Ondak’s roots and his own history and how it is a part of him. The oak tree symbolises knowledge and resistance which reflects one of the overarching meanings of the installation, passing knowledge down to other generations so that they too may learn about the past which is a fact and can not be changed.

Sources:

http://thisistomorrow.info/articles/roman-ondak-the-source-of-art-is-in-the-life-of-a-people

https://www.estherschipper.com/artists/61-roman-ondak/works/14255/#:~:text=Event%20Horizon%20is%20a%20sculptural,exhibited%20aligned%20in%20a%20row.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/event-horizon

https://www.southlondongallery.org/exhibitions/roman-ondak-the-source-of-art-is-in-the-life-of-a-people/

Fabric and eggs dyed using onion skins :)

Finished heart embroidery for my animation. A heart surrounded by embroidery folk patterns from around the world

Landscape art, Jeanne Claude and Christo.

Wrapped Trees, 1988

‘Wrapped trees’ by Jeanne Claude and Christo, is a unique piece of land art. The two artists worked together and were an art duo which focused on large scale artwork throughout their careers. Claude was from Morocco and Christo from Bulgaria, they were both born on the exact same day in the same year on the 13th of June 1935 and got married in 1960. Their artwork focused on wrapping up huge man made structures or huge natural structures. One of their most famous works was wrapping up the Reichstag in Berlin in 1995 which took 90 climbers and 180 installation workers to complete. This was done with polypropylene fabric and rope. Another piece that they are particularly well known for is wrapping up the West Coast of Australia in 1968. The fabric covered one million square feet, its size shows the sheer scale in the work of Claude and Christo. 

The piece of land art ‘wrapped trees’ was created in 1988 and took 9 days to complete. 178 trees in a park in Riehen in Switzerland were covered by transparent fabric, and this artwork was left up for 3 weeks. The original plan was to wrap 330 trees in the Avenue des Champs-Élysées in Paris, however their plan was denied. The trees were wrapped with 592,015 square feet polyester fabric which is the same fabric used in Japan to protect trees from frost, snow and general winter weather. The fabric was all tied on just by using rope. The finished piece is very effective and the trees look ghost- like, mysterious and out of the ordinary. The fabric changed shape slightly and blew in the wind, at different times of the day, different colours light and different intensities of light would shine through the polyester fabric. This created a diaphanous effect which allowed all of the individual branches to be seen. The piece of land art was up in November, so the start of winter once all the leaves had fallen off of the trees. This allowed the branches and main structure of the tree to be seen clearly. The fabric also shrouded the trees in a way that gave the impression of the shape that all of the leaves would take if they were there. This use of negative space almost highlighted the absence of the leaves which gave a ghost-like quality to the work.

Christo once said “Jeanne-Claude and I borrow space and create a gentle disturbance in it for just a few days. When they appear for a few days, they carry this tremendous freedom of irresponsibility.” This quote reveals a lot about the intention behind the work of the artist duo. After all of their work, Claude and Christo made sure that the ropes and fabric that they used were never thrown away but recycled. It is possible that their work overall reflects the alteration of the natural world for our human needs; it could be a message about climate change and the environment. On the other hand, the work ‘wrapped trees’ could be about the fact that nothing lasts forever and everything is fleeting. The artists have to take their work down eventually, if they don’t then they would be intercepting with nature. In the quote, Christo talks about the ‘freedom of irresponsibly’. The artists had the freedom to put their work over the trees but then it is their responsibility to take it back down. This may reflect the importance for everything in nature to return to its natural state.

References

https://christojeanneclaude.net/mobile/projects?p=wrapped-reichstag

https://coveringchristo.wordpress.com/rationale/

http://www.artnet.com/artists/christo-and-jeanne-claude/

https://christojeanneclaude.net/mobile/projects?p=wrapped-trees

https://coveringchristo.wordpress.com/rationale/